This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. The quotes, images, videos etc., included in these posts come courtesy of Wikipedia, Wikimedia, Bartlett’s, About, Google, Flixxy.com. Ted’s talk, Internet Archive. All my personal copy here is ‘free to use’. Images, videos, and talks I have used are classified as ‘derivative work’ and deserve proper attribution from the relevant sources. Note my inclusion above of the sources I have used. All images used on this page are always being re-evaluated to ensure they fall into the ‘free to use’ category. All material is used by me in good faith to follow the Public Domain, ‘free to use’ and share policies, within the Internet structure and a non-commercial environment. This Creative Commons License has been acquired as it is essential that this information is also shared and brought to a higher level. It is always courteous to provide attribution. Based on a work at http://imperativeobservations.wordpress.com“. Permissions beyond the scope of this license may be available at http://imperative observations.wordpress.com. All text referred to by other writers will be acknowledged at the bottom of each of each page. My understanding of the teachings of ancient and contemporary wisdom is not authoritative. My expressions on any of the subjects are solely based on my research, and application of concepts eventually perceived as irrefutable realities. My history of blogging has always been non-commercial, and free to use, and its content is not disposed to attract contemporary commercial social media. The internet now has serious issues to deal with. Multiple varieties of International companies with Big Brother complexes seek your personal data and misuse it. The content on these pages is not a commercial commodity. Nor are human beings. The Hippocratic Oath by the medical profession “First do no harm” might be very applicable. We should remember that the Internet has a very short lifespan from the 1950s, and the evolution to date is astonishing. Its conception emerged from human consciousness, probably with the expectation that its beneficial qualities would be used to disperse new and creative truths for all life on this planet. It’s misuse, we can only hope, will have its own correction mechanism. All the energy needed to disseminate anything that is of value, cannot come from one person alone. True energy needs a sharing dimension and new concepts for it to grow. Each blog on this domain will now come as a short separate entity with collateral information to bring my self and any readers up to date. Archival material is available.
My sincere thanks to all the notifications I’ve received. Physically impossible for me to answer individually, but would still welcome comments. The purpose of this entry is to provide some elementary information that may put a new light on both my domain sites. Each post will belong to a series of scheduled posts that may extend to 2012. They will consist of older posts with upgraded material and new titles. They will also be copied and pasted to allow me the time needed to transfer their content. In my absence, they will then be available if the technology is sound. This will be a challenge for me. Wish me luck.
……………………………………….
This Placeholder. Will be a constant theme throughout these scheduled blogs.
We do not own Space
We do not own Time
We do not own Energy
We do not own Matter.
“The price of real freedom is ‘knowing’ we are dependent”.

Courtesy of Google “free to use images.

A place to be. (Family photograph)
Despite debates about The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 1927 (the year I was born) and it’s veracity or otherwise, I am only able to question the terminology used to describe a quantum theory. Instead of ‘principle’ would the term ‘diversion’ be more appropriate? There are schools of thought that bring our reality experiences into question, and the consciousness we use to experience their existence. The only reason we can apply principles is that they are logically established, recognized, and the result of that is, we constantly use them, including I’m sure, all correct theories of quantum physics. Where there are principles (correct theories) there is certainty. They provide the reason for multitudinous common-sense activity, which translated in any community makes sense of what is common to us all. It has already been said in my Home page, that curiously, the sensory receptors of Homo sapiens seem to be remarkably accurate in universally acting in concert with the various functions required for civilized societies to survive. Our evolutionary advantage is that language with all its complexities has already been created.
Our conscious understanding will be collectively diminished by the apparent separateness of race, nationality, tradition, and beliefs that exist. Categories that demand our constant attention.
The contemporary need is to correlate human consciousness, use observable categories, and meld them into an enlightened recognized construction of the whole.
Universal meaning lies within the use of language without dichotomies, whatever language is used. Semantic translation without dichotomies will have the beneficial effect of finding common agreement, clarity of reason, and the release of historically embedded impediments.
The exercise of uniting principal terms without dichotomies is imperative to break down crystallized concepts that are counterproductive to individuals, and societies. Their effect would not be the changing of what is, but the experience of seeing reality as it is.
Writing about the existence of dichotomies in language is not unprecedented. Heraclitus (c.535-c.475 BC) made them appear in historical philosophy.
Universal meaning lies within the use of language without dichotomies, whatever language is used. Semantic translation without dichotomies will have the beneficial effect of finding common agreement, clarity of reason, and the release of historically embedded impediments.
The exercise of uniting principal terms without dichotomies is imperative to break down crystallized concepts that are counterproductive to individuals, and societies. Their effect would not be the changing of what is, but the experience of seeing reality as it is.
Writing about the existence of dichotomies in language is not unprecedented. Heraclitus (c.535-c.475 BC) made them appear in historical philosophy.