A family photograph of a work in progress.   Despite debates about The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle 1927 (the year I was born) and it’s veracity, or otherwise, I am only able to question the terminology used to describe a quantum theory. Instead of ‘principle’ would the term ‘diversion’ be more appropriate? Make it sound less like a contradiction in terms. There are schools of thought that bring our real experiences into question, and the consciousness we use to experience their existence. The only reason we can apply principles is that they are logically established, recognized, and the result of that is that we constantly use them, including I’m sure, all correct theories of quantum physics. Where there are principles (correct theories) there is always certainty. They provide the reason for multitudinous common-sense activity, which translated in any community makes sense of what is common to us all. It has already been said in my Home page, that curiously, the sensory receptors of Homo sapiens seem to be remarkably accurate in universally acting in concert with the various functions required for civilized societies to survive. Our evolutionary advantage is that language, with all its complexities has already been created.

 A necessary reason for our lives is the use of language to communicate the relationship we have with each other, and our understanding of that action. Our conscious understanding will be collectively diminished by the apparent separateness of race, nationality, tradition, and beliefs that exist. Categories that demand our constant attention. The contemporary need is to correlate human consciousness, utilize observable categories, and meld them into an enlightened construction of the whole. Universal meaning lies within the use of language without dichotomies, whatever language is used. Semantic translation without dichotomies will have the beneficial effect of finding common agreement, clarity of reason, and the release of historically embedded impediments. The exercise of uniting principle terms without dichotomies is imperative to break down crystallized concepts that are counterproductive to individuals, and societies. Their effect would not be the changing of what is, but the experience of seeing reality as it is. Writing about the existence of dichotomies in language is not unprecedented. Heraclitus (c.535-c.475 BC) made them appear in historical philosophy.

Mindfulness semantics operate through you with their own agenda. Their binary properties and subsequent definition are of a dimension outside our conscious awareness. Mindfulness and healing are co-existent, and their activity is not a personal property that functions within the realms of our space-time-energy-matter domains. Look upon the practice of mindfulness as a social contribution whose effects may take their own manifestation.

Curiously, and paradoxically, some ‘facts’ you may have to learn to live with as above. We do not own any Space. We do not own any Time. We do not own any Energy. We do not own any Matter.

The double helix effect of mindfulness semantics is infinite and adds beneficially to our collective consciousness. The personal benefit comes with the realization that a change of being has taken place, and our functionality has elevated. We evolve. Let it be. Create your own semantic template guide. It is an invaluable tool.

The greatest knowledge you can ever have is your own! Coupled with that your semantic template’s innate ability to ‘understand’ the meaning contained in your experience. Knowledge without understanding its meaning and potential is like a dry seed withering on the ground

Given the remarkable talk below, maybe semantics and their real value is beginning to bear fruit. In a way, as a layman, I find some validation to the stuff I write.

https://embed.ted.com/talks/mariano_sigman_your_words_may_predict_your_future_mental_health.

Shortcode not available, please use the above link.